<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best of 2009 &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emmamaree.com/personal-life/best-of-2009-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emmamaree.com/personal-life/best-of-2009-part-1/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>YA Writer, Tech Support Girl &#38; Tea Addict</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: E.Maree</title>
		<link>http://emmamaree.com/personal-life/best-of-2009-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>E.Maree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.used-goods.net/forbidden_knowledge/?p=494#comment-48</guid>
		<description>To each their own, B. :) I can&#039;t fault your criticism - the biology class thing is getting cliche (which is a bit weird), and I mentioned above being annoyed at the various occurences of &#039;Angel&#039;.
As far as character dynamics go though, it kept me interested - I found the interactions were a lot more vibrant than a lot of what&#039;s going on in YA right now.
Honestly though, this year was a pick of the best of a very similar crop of YA novels that have been shoved my way for review thanks to the Twilight trend.
I&#039;m going to take a wild guesss and say you&#039;ve been able to read a better variety of stuff. Any recommendations for your own book of &#039;09?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To each their own, B. <img src='http://emmamaree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I can&#8217;t fault your criticism &#8211; the biology class thing is getting cliche (which is a bit weird), and I mentioned above being annoyed at the various occurences of &#8216;Angel&#8217;.<br />
As far as character dynamics go though, it kept me interested &#8211; I found the interactions were a lot more vibrant than a lot of what&#8217;s going on in YA right now.</p>
<p>Honestly though, this year was a pick of the best of a very similar crop of YA novels that have been shoved my way for review thanks to the Twilight trend.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to take a wild guesss and say you&#8217;ve been able to read a better variety of stuff. Any recommendations for your own book of &#8217;09?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.Maree</title>
		<link>http://emmamaree.com/personal-life/best-of-2009-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>E.Maree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.used-goods.net/forbidden_knowledge/?p=494#comment-255</guid>
		<description>To each their own, B. :) I can&#039;t fault your criticism - the biology class thing is getting cliche (which is a bit weird), and I mentioned above being annoyed at the various occurences of &#039;Angel&#039;.
As far as character dynamics go though, it kept me interested - I found the interactions were a lot more vibrant than a lot of what&#039;s going on in YA right now.
Honestly though, this year was a pick of the best of a very similar crop of YA novels that have been shoved my way for review thanks to the Twilight trend.
I&#039;m going to take a wild guesss and say you&#039;ve been able to read a better variety of stuff. Any recommendations for your own book of &#039;09?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To each their own, B. <img src='http://emmamaree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I can&#8217;t fault your criticism &#8211; the biology class thing is getting cliche (which is a bit weird), and I mentioned above being annoyed at the various occurences of &#8216;Angel&#8217;.<br />
As far as character dynamics go though, it kept me interested &#8211; I found the interactions were a lot more vibrant than a lot of what&#8217;s going on in YA right now. </p>
<p>Honestly though, this year was a pick of the best of a very similar crop of YA novels that have been shoved my way for review thanks to the Twilight trend.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to take a wild guesss and say you&#8217;ve been able to read a better variety of stuff. Any recommendations for your own book of &#8217;09?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://emmamaree.com/personal-life/best-of-2009-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.used-goods.net/forbidden_knowledge/?p=494#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me? I started to read the book and got around 150 pages in and all that had happened was the girl sitting in her biol class, with - surprise surprise - a mean, devastatingly good looking boy. Then they flirt, she gets flustered, class ends, she goes home to think about him a lot and/or stalk him, and then repeat. I tried to like it, I really did. But it had no substance, it was one giant cliché (I practically laughed out loud when he started calling her Angel. Not to mention when I read he rode a motorbike) and the writing style itself just wasn&#039;t compelling enough to keep me going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? I started to read the book and got around 150 pages in and all that had happened was the girl sitting in her biol class, with &#8211; surprise surprise &#8211; a mean, devastatingly good looking boy. Then they flirt, she gets flustered, class ends, she goes home to think about him a lot and/or stalk him, and then repeat. I tried to like it, I really did. But it had no substance, it was one giant cliché (I practically laughed out loud when he started calling her Angel. Not to mention when I read he rode a motorbike) and the writing style itself just wasn&#8217;t compelling enough to keep me going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://emmamaree.com/personal-life/best-of-2009-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.used-goods.net/forbidden_knowledge/?p=494#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me? I started to read the book and got around 150 pages in and all that had happened was the girl sitting in her biol class, with - surprise surprise - a mean, devastatingly good looking boy. Then they flirt, she gets flustered, class ends, she goes home to think about him a lot and/or stalk him, and then repeat. I tried to like it, I really did. But it had no substance, it was one giant cliché (I practically laughed out loud when he started calling her Angel. Not to mention when I read he rode a motorbike) and the writing style itself just wasn&#039;t compelling enough to keep me going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? I started to read the book and got around 150 pages in and all that had happened was the girl sitting in her biol class, with &#8211; surprise surprise &#8211; a mean, devastatingly good looking boy. Then they flirt, she gets flustered, class ends, she goes home to think about him a lot and/or stalk him, and then repeat. I tried to like it, I really did. But it had no substance, it was one giant cliché (I practically laughed out loud when he started calling her Angel. Not to mention when I read he rode a motorbike) and the writing style itself just wasn&#8217;t compelling enough to keep me going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: emmamaree.com @ 2012-05-19 00:04:30 -->
